Unless you've been living in the Galapagos, most have seen or heard of Indiana's new religious freedom law, which is really an amendment to Indiana's civil procedure called, "Chapter 9. Religious Freedom Restoration". This law was very short-sighted. As a Christian, I have the right to say, "I'm sorry, I can't marry you because I'm a Christian and I won't perform a wedding with a buddah shrine and chanting monks because it is against my religious beliefs." and I appreciate that right being protected but, is that discrimination? There are some churches that will not marry you or let you use their facilities because you are not an active member. Is that discrimination? A restaurant owner can put a sign on the storefront that says, "No shirt. No shoes. No service." Is that discrimination? Why is only one of those examples needing the support of a law?
It is because of the "possibility" or fear that this law will be used for what it was never intended, that Indiana will suffer the consequences (via our economy). This law should never have been created, let alone passed. Why? It shouldn't have been necessary. If an establishment doesn't want to serve you, what happened to going to the next one? If a restaurant doesn't want to serve me, I'd rather leave than take the risk that they would put something non-edible in my food. If I want to do something about that incident, report it to the Indiana Civil Rights Commission and let them investigate. The negative press alone will bring that establishment to its knees and make them think twice about discriminating again.
Regarding the labels on the window storefronts? How much more can people overreact? I think the obvious difference between this law and the 1968 Civil Rights Act is color. I have NO "homosexual radar". Unless you are flamboyantly effeminate as a male or masculine as a female, I don't have a clue until you tell me. And even if I know, I just don't care. To even assume someone is gay is idiotic. I go out to eat with my sisters or female friends and if anyone thought we were gay, they either didn't let us know or didn't care.
This law was attempting to fix a "mole hill" and extremist decided to make it into a "mountain". What retail chain of bars, restaurants, hotels, gyms, bakeries, etc. would have the stupidity to reject someone based on race, sexual orientation or gender if they want to maintain their business and create revenue?
Just another law to give Christians a bad rap.